Published: 9 January 2017
Revised: 30 January 2017
Committees
Minutes of the 57th meeting of the Medicines Classification Committee held in Wellington on Tuesday 1 November 2016 at 9:30 am
Secretary's note regarding the minute below from the 57th meeting of the Medicines Classification Committee (MCC) held on Tuesday 1 November 2016:
An error has been identifed in the minutes of the 57th meeting. The letter referred to in agenda item 10.1 was received from the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, not the New Zealand Self Medication Industry. Therefore the recommendation will be amended to:
That the Secretary should write to the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists informing them that the Committee did not consider there to be sufficient evidence to support a submission for the relcassification of pholcodine.
Present:
S Jessamine (Chair)
K Baddock
A Harwood
K Miedema
A Shirtcliffe
H Hoang (Secretary)
In Attendance (from Medsafe):
S Reader (Manager, Product Regulation)
L Russell (Team Leader, Medicines Assessment)
L Holding (Team Leader, Committee and Support Services)
J Lagan (Advisor, Compliance Management)
S Kenyon (Principal Technical Specialist - Pharmacovigilance, Clinical Risk
Management)
Representatives:
B Buckham (Pharmaceutical Society of New Zealand)
P Duncan (Pharmacy Council New Zealand)
N Gauld (Natalie Gauld Ltd)
M Pead (Pharmacy Council New Zealand)
A Van Wyk (Green Cross Healthcare Ltd)
Apologies:
L Toop
1 |
WelcomeThe Chair opened the 57th meeting at 9:27 am and welcomed members and guests. |
||||||||||
2 |
ApologiesApologies were received from L Toop. |
||||||||||
3 |
Confirmation of the minutes of the 55th meeting held on Tuesday 3 May 2016One member requested clarification on paragraph three of agenda item 10.1 - Calcium hydroxyapatite and polycaprolactone as dermal fillers. The minutes stated that dermal filler administrators are regulated under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994. It was explained that non-regulated health professionals are administered under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 because they are not designated to the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003. The Committee was informed that Medsafe will be re-examining
the categorisation of dermal fillers. It was noted that the MHRA
regulation of dermal fillers is under review
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/192028/Review_of_the_Regulation_of_Cosmetic_Interventions.pdf, The minutes of the 55th meeting were accepted as a true and accurate record. The minutes were signed and dated by the Chair. |
||||||||||
4 |
Declaration of conflicts of interestThe Conflict of Interest forms were returned to the Secretary. The following conflicts of interest were declared:
All other members declared they had no additional interests which would pose a conflict with any of the items on the agenda. |
||||||||||
5 |
Matters arising |
||||||||||
5.1 |
Report on agenda items from the previous meeting
|
||||||||||
5.2 |
Objections made at the previous meetingThere were no objections made to the recommendations made at the 55th meeting held on Tuesday 3 May 2016. The 56th meeting for Natural Health Products, which was scheduled for late September 2016 has been postponed until the Natural Health Products Bill has had its third reading in Parliament. |
||||||||||
5.3 |
Updating the guidance document titled 'How to change the legal classification of a medicine in New Zealand' and other MCC processes.At the recent 55th Medicine Classification Committee (MCC) meeting, the Committee made the recommendation that:
Following this recommendation, Medsafe has reviewed the current MCC processes as well as developing a proposal for an update to the decision criteria currently used. Discussion The Chair introduced the consultation document, which proposed an update to the guidance document titled ‘How to change the legal classification of a medicine’ as well as other committee processes. He noted that comments received expressed a diverse range of opinion. Some supported increased transparency while others supported withholding information provided to the expert committee ie, removing the consultation process. The Committee’s discussion focused on:
The Committee discussed at length, the conflicting submissions regarding transparency of the medicine reclassification process. The Committee noted that some confidentiality requests of data that are received meet the commercially sensitive criteria of the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). This data includes product formulations, some bioequivalence data, sales strategies and unpublished data, which the Committee agreed should be withheld. The Committee agreed that public consultation of the agenda is a useful mechanism to capture other professional and professional body opinions and assessments of training tools and supporting documentation, as it can highlight aspects that may not have been considered otherwise. One member noted that there were many different healthcare practitioners involved in the administration of medicines and provisions of patient care and not all are represented on the Committee. The Committee also noted that some submitters considered that citations used to support their proposals were commercially sensitive information. The Committee agreed that for full consultations to take place, complete reference lists would need to be available in the public domain. The Committee discussed the possibilities of making information available only by request or for a limited period, however, it was noted that the information would still be within the Ministry’s records and would be released on request under the OIA. Therefore, the Committee considered there to be limited value in restricting the release of information unless requested under the OIA as it could result in an unnecessary administrative burden for Medsafe. The Committee agreed with the purpose of the OIA to progressively increase the availability of official information to the people of New Zealand, and that any information regarding medicine classification that would otherwise be obtainable under OIA should be made permanently available on the Medsafe website. The Committee also noted that the proposal outlined in agenda item 5.4 - Medicine reclassification process could possibly enhance collaboration between appropriate professional bodies. The Committee also noted the comments regarding one of PHARMAC’s consulting models that involves the disclosure of a summary of the proposal being considered, which is produced by PHARMAC staff. However, the Committee considered that this model would not suit the reclassification process as it would take significant resource to summarise the reclassification submissions. The Committee considered the pilot process of having observers at the meeting. The Committee noted the comments made during consultation, some of which supported completely open meetings, and some of which supported completely closed meetings. The Committee noted the observer process of other Medsafe committees; Medicines Assessment Advisory Committee (MAAC) and Medicines Adverse Reaction Committee (MARC). Medsafe officials explained that the observer process for the MAAC was under reassessment, and that selected visitors such as academics are invited to the MARC. The Committee considered that it would be useful if Medsafe could produce a consultation paper that reviewed this process for the next meeting. The Committee reviewed the new reclassification decision parameters proposed. Overall, the Committee was pleased with the amendments. However, it was noted that communal harm had been removed and that the replacement criteria did not appear adequate. It was explained that the intention of the removal of communal harm was due to the consideration that it was covered by other aspects of the parameters. The Committee requested that this should be made more explicit as communal harm is an important factor of the parameters. The Committee discussed the need for a risk analysis of unintended consequences to be included. The Committee discussed the addition of a risk mitigation section to provide advice on how items such as training programmes and restrictions on sale can be used to mitigate risk. The Committee also agreed that safety was an important criterion in medicine reclassification and that this should be agreed by relevant professional bodies before a reclassification takes place. The Committee recommended that the revised version of the document titled ‘How to change the legal classification of a medicine in New Zealand’ should be added to the agenda of an upcoming meeting for consultation. The Committee also discussed who can make submissions for medicine reclassifications. The Committee disagreed with the comment received suggesting that only sponsors should be allowed to make reclassification submissions. The Committee noted that such a limitation would significantly restrict the reclassification process. Historically, submissions on medicine reclassification has been open to all and the Committee did not consider it appropriate to change this. The Committee considered the remaining aspects of the consultation document appropriate. RecommendationThat Medsafe should provide a final document to the Secretary in time for addition to the agenda of an upcoming meeting to allow for a full consultation. That Medsafe should review the observer process and provide a consultation paper to the Secretary in time for addition to the agenda of an upcoming meeting to allow for a full consultation. |
||||||||||
5.4 |
Medicine reclassification – proposed
process when considering the reclassification of prescription medicines
to restricted medicines
|
||||||||||
5.5 |
Review of codeine classificationThe outcomes of the Australian Committee on Medicine Scheduling (ACMS) meeting in August 2015 were released to the Committee. The Committee reviewed the outcomes regarding the classification of codeine and signalled it would consider harmonising with the Australian Schedule. The Committee noted harmonisation with Australia would affect the current classification of codeine. The Committee requested that the Secretary add the recommendation to the agenda of the 58th meeting to allow for a full consultation. The Committee noted that the ACMS upscheduled codeine in its pure form or in combination, to prescription medicine, as it considered that there are safer alternatives available. A Medsafe official stated that no abuse or misuse research had been conducted in New Zealand to indicate there was need for concern. The Committee noted that the prevalence of ibuprofen/paracetamol combination products in New Zealand may have reduced patient’s reliance on codeine for effective pain relief. RecommendationThat an item to consider the reclassification of codeine should be added to the agenda for the 58th meeting for the possible harmonisation with Australia of all pharmacy only entries of codeine to be amended to restricted medicine. That Medsafe should review the relationships between the Australian and New Zealand markets, the role of codeine in cough in cold products and whether the benefit of its use outweighs the risk of harm. |
||||||||||
6 |
Submissions for reclassification |
||||||||||
6.1 |
Bifonazole – proposed amendment to the
general sale medicine classification
|
||||||||||
6.2 |
Melatonin
|
||||||||||
6.3 |
Melatonin
|
||||||||||
6.4 |
Selected oral contraceptives (desogestrel,
ethinylestradiol, levonorgestrel and norethisterone)
|
||||||||||
7 |
New medicines for classificationThe following new chemical entities were submitted to the Committee for classification. |
||||||||||
7.1 |
Betaine – proposed classification as
a restricted medicine
|
||||||||||
7.2 |
New chemical entities that are not yet classified in New Zealand |
||||||||||
a. |
Albutrepenonacog alfaAlbutrepenonacog alfa is a purified protein produced by recombinant DNA technology. It is produced by the genetic fusion of recombinant albumin to recombinant coagulation factor IX (FIX). Albutrepenonacog alfa is indicated in all patients with haemophilia B for:
Albutrepenonacog alfa is a recombinant fusion protein linking recombinant coagulation FIX with recombinant albumin that effectively replaces the missing coagulation FIX needed for haemostasis and provides for longer dose regimens. The prolongation of the half-life of FIX and the enhanced systemic exposure are achieved by fusion with recombinant albumin. Albumin is a natural, inert carrier protein in plasma with a long half-life of approximately 20 days that is not involved in immune defence or immune response. Genetic fusion of recombinant coagulation FIX with albumin extends the half-life of FIX. Albutrepenonacog alfa is not classified in Australia. The Committee noted that other blood products are general sale medicines and that this classification allows blood transfusion centres to distribute the products without a pharmacist present. RecommendationThat Albutrepenonacog alfa should be classified as a general sale medicine. |
||||||||||
b. |
AtezolizumabAtezolizumab is an engineered, humanised, monoclonal antibody that directly binds to the protein programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and blocks interactions with the programmed death 1 (PD-1) and B7.1 receptors. Atezolizumab is indicated for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic:
Binding of PD-L1 to the PD-1 and B7.1 receptors found on T-cells suppresses cytotoxic T-cell activity through the inhibition of T-cell proliferation and cytokine production. PD-L1 may be expressed on tumour cells and tumour-infiltrating immune cells, and can contribute to the inhibition of the anti-tumour immune response in the microenvironment. Atezolizumab is an iron-engineered humanised immunoglobulin Gl (IgGl) monoclonal antibody that directly binds to PD-L1 and blocks interactions with the PD-1 and B7.1 receptors, releasing PD-L1/PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response, including reactivating the anti-tumour immune response. Atezolizumab leaves the PD-L2/PD-1 interaction intact, allowing PD-L2/PD-1 mediated inhibitory signals to persist. In syngeneic mouse tumour models, blocking PD-L1 activity resulted in decreased tumour growth. Atezolizumab is not classified in Australia. RecommendationThat Atezolizumab should be classified as a prescription medicine. |
||||||||||
c. |
OcrelizumabOcrelizumab is a recombinant humanised anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (lgG1 subtype). Ocrelizumab is indicated for the treatment of patients with:
Ocrelizumab is a recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody that selectively targets CD20 expressing B-cells. CD20 is a cell surface antigen found on pre-B-cells, mature and memory B-cells but not expressed on lymphoid stem cells and plasma cells. The precise mechanisms through which ocrelizumab exerts its therapeutic clinical effects in multiple sclerosis are not fully elucidated but is presumed to involve immunomodulation through the reduction in the number and function of CD20-expressing B-cells. Following cell surface binding, ocrelizumab selectively depletes CD20-expressing B-cells through antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, and apoptosis. The capacity of B-cell reconstitution and pre-existing humoural immunity are preserved. In addition, innate immunity and total T-cell numbers are not affected. Treatment with ocrelizumab leads to rapid depletion of CD19+ B-cells in blood by 14 days post treatment (first time-point of assessment) as an expected pharmacologic effect. This was sustained throughout the treatment period. For the B-cell counts, CD19 is used as the presence of ocrelizumab interferes with the detection of CD20 by the assay. Ocrelizumab is not classified in Australia. RecommendationThat Ocrelizumab should be classified as a prescription medicine. |
||||||||||
d. |
OsimertinibOsimertinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. It is indicated for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Osimertinib is a selective and irreversible inhibitor of EGFRs which harbour single (L858R or del746-750) or double (L858R/T790M or del746-750/T790M) mutations. In vitro studies have demonstrated that osimertinib has high potency and inhibitory activity against EGFR across a range of all clinically relevant EGFR sensitising-mutant and T790M mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines (apparent IC50s from 6 nM to 54 nM against phospho-EGFR). This leads to inhibition of cell growth, while showing significantly less activity against EGFR in wild-type cell lines (apparent IC50s 480 nM to 1.8 μM against phospho-EGFR). In vivo oral administration of osimertinib leads to tumour shrinkage in both EGFRm and T790M NSCLC xenograft and transgenic mouse lung tumour models. Treatment with osimertinib should be initiated by a physician experienced in the use of anticancer therapies. Osimertinib is not classified in Australia. RecommendationThat Osimertinib should be classified as a prescription medicine. |
||||||||||
e. |
Rurioctocog alfa pegolRurioctocog alfa pegol, pegylated recombinant human factor VIII, is a full-length form of human coagulation factor VIII (parent molecule: ADVATE [Octocog alfa, Recombinant Human Factor VIII]) with an extended half-life. Rurioctocog alfa pegol is indicated in haemophilia A (congenital factor VIII deficiency) patients for:
Rurioctocog alfa pegol is not indicated for the treatment of von Willebrand disease. The factor VIII/von Willebrand factor complex consists of two molecules (factor VIII and von Willebrand factor) with different physiological functions. When infused into a haemophilic patient, factor VIII binds to von willebrand factor in the patient's circulation. Activated factor VIII acts as a cofactor for activated factor IX, accelerating the conversion of factor X to activated factor X. Activated factor X converts prothrombin into thrombin. Thrombin then converts fibrinogen into fibrin and a clot can be formed. Haemophilia A is a X-chromosomal linked hereditary disorder of blood coagulation due to decreased levels of factor VIII:C and results in profuse bleeding into joints, muscles or internal organs, either spontaneously or as results of accidental or surgical trauma. By replacement therapy, the plasma levels of factor VIII are increased, thereby enabling a temporary correction of the factor deficiency and correction of the bleeding tendencies. Rurioctocog alfa pegol is not classified in Australia. The Committee noted that other blood products are general sale medicines and that this classification allows blood transfusion centres to distribute the products without a pharmacist present. RecommendationThat Rurioctocog alfa pegol should be classified as a general sale medicine. |
||||||||||
8 |
Harmonisation of the New Zealand and Australian schedules |
||||||||||
8.1 |
New chemical entities which are not yet classified in New Zealand |
||||||||||
8.1.a |
AlirocumabAlirocumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody (IgG1 isotype) that specifically targets proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). Alirocumab is produced by recombinant DNA technology in Chinese Hamster Ovary cell suspension culture. Alirocumab is indicated:
It was noted that alirocumab has an insignificant abuse potential. It does not produce dependency. The Committee stated they did not have any concerns about alirocumab. Alirocumab is classified as a prescription medicine in Australia. RecommendationThat alirocumab should be classified as a prescription medicine. |
||||||||||
8.1.b |
ArmodafinilModafinil is a racemic mixture of the enantiomers R-modafinil and S-modafinil with the stereogenic centre at the sulphur atom. Armodafinil is R-modafinil only. Modafinil/armodafinil are oral wakefulness promoting agents, but pharmacologically different from other stimulants (including sympathomimetic amines). The exact mechanism of action is unknown. Armodafinil is indicated:
The Committee noted that armodafinil is not listed in the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 (the Misuse of Drugs Act). Armodafinil is classified as a prescription medicine in Australia. RecommendationThat armodafinil should be classified as a prescription medicine. |
||||||||||
8.1.c |
Asfotase alfaAsfotase alfa is a human recombinant tissue on specific alkaline phosphatase (TNSALP)-Fc-deca-aspartate fusion protein with enzymatic activity, produced by recombinant DNA technology using mammalian Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell culture. Asfotase alfa is indicated for long-term enzyme replacement therapy in patients with paediatric onset hypophosphatasia. The Committee noted that asfotase alfa is primarily used by endocrinologists for the management of bone disorders. Asfotase alfa is classified as a prescription medicine in Australia. RecommendationThat asfotase alfa should be classified as a prescription medicine. |
||||||||||
8.1.d |
Deoxycholic acidDeoxycholic acid is a an adipocytolytic drug, which when injected into localized subcutaneous fat, physically disrupts the cell membrane of adipocytes and causes adipocytolysis, the destruction of fat cells. Deoxycholic acid is indicated for the improvement in the appearance of moderate to severe convexity or fullness associated with submental fat in adults. Deoxycholic acid is classified as a prescription medicine in Australia. Currently, deoxycholic acid is a general sale medicine and is also in a natural health product as it is a natural component of bile sales. The Committee noted that in its injectable form it is used for lyposysis in chins. RecommendationThat deoxycholic acid for injection should be classified as a prescription medicine. That deoxycholic acid in its oral form should remain as a general sale medicine. |
||||||||||
8.1.e |
Di-iodohydroxyquinolineDi-iodohydroxyquinoline (INN) or iodoquinol (USAN) is a quinoline derivative that is used in the treatment of amoebiasis. In Australia, di-iodohydroxyquinoline is classified as:
The Committee noted that quinoline derivatives:
The Committee noted that restricted medicine entry of di-iodohydroxyquinoline in Australia applies to its antifungal properties. The Committee recalled the use of Dalacin T as a topical acne treatment. The Committee noted that proposing to classify di-iodohydroxyquinoline as a prescription medicine for vaginal use only, would result in the unintended consequence that di-iodohydroxyquinoline would be an unscheduled medicine for all other indications. Therefore, the Committee considered it appropriate to classify di-iodohydroxyquinoline as a prescription medicine for all indications including for vaginal use. RecommendationThat di-iodohydroxyquinoline should be classified as a prescription medicine. |
||||||||||
8.1.f |
FlubromazolamFlubromazolam is a benzodiazepine derivative. It is a triazolo analogue of the designer benzodiazepine, flubromazepam. Benzodiazepines enhance the activity of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), a major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain. This results in anxiolytic, sedative, hypnotic, muscle relaxant and antiepileptic effects. Flubromazolam has high potency, and can cause strong sedation and amnesia at oral doses as low as 500 micrograms. Flubromazolam has an onset of effect of 30 minutes, and duration of effect of 12-18 hours. After effects are experienced for ≥ 24 hours. There is a risk of fatal overdose if benzodiazepine derivatives such as flubromazolam are combined with other central nervous system depressants such as opioid analgesics, alcohol and 4-hydroxybutanoic acid (GHB). Flubromazolam has no currently established therapeutic use and is likely to present a high risk of dependency, abuse, misuse or illicit use. The dangers associated with flubromazolam are such as to warrant limiting use to strictly controlled medical and scientific research. Flubromazepam has a much longer time to onset of effect (four hours) and much longer duration of effect (three days) than flubromazolam. The Committee noted the following information on flubromazolam, that:
It was noted that flubromazolam is captured as a prescription medicine under the benzodiazepine derivatives group entry under the Medicines Regulations 1984 (the Medicines Regulations). Benzodiazepine derivatives are individually listed in Schedule 3 of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 1975 as class C5 controlled drug. The Committee noted the risks associated with flubromazolam and suggested scheduling it with the highest classifications available under the Medicines Act and the Misuse of Drugs Act. RecommendationThat flubromazolam should be classified as a prescription medicine. That flubromazolam should be referred to the Expert Advisory Committee on Drugs with the advice that it should be scheduled with a more restrictive classification than the C5 entry for benzodiazepine derivatives. |
||||||||||
8.1.g |
Follitropin deltaFollitropin delta is a novel human recombinant follicle stimulating hormone intended for controlled ovarian stimulation in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) therapy such as in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Follitropin delta is indicated for controlled ovarian stimulation for the development of multiple follicles in women undergoing ART such as an in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or ICSI cycle. Follitropin delta is classified as a prescription medicine in Australia. RecommendationThat follitropin delta should be classified as a prescription medicine. |
||||||||||
8.1.h |
Hexyl AminolevulinateHexyl aminolevulinate (as hydrochloride) is a hexyl ester of 5aminolevulinic acid (5ALA or ALA), which is the first specific intermediate of heme biosynthesis. Hexyl aminolevulinate is indicated as adjunct to standard white light cystoscopy to contribute to the diagnosis and management of bladder cancer in patients with known or high suspicion of bladder cancer. Hexyl aminolevulinate is classified as a prescription medicine in Australia. RecommendationThat hexyl aminolevulinate should be classified as a prescription medicine. |
||||||||||
8.1.i |
IxekizumabIxekizumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody against the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin17A (IL17A). Ixekizumab is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Ixekizumab is classified as a prescription medicine in Australia. RecommendationThat ixekizumab should be classified as a prescription medicine. |
||||||||||
8.1.j |
Phleum pratense extractPhleum pratense extract is a standardised allergen extract of grass pollen from Timothy-grass (phleum pratense). Phleum pratense extract is indicated for:
It was noted that all other allergens are prescription medicines. Phleum pratense pollen extract (Timothy-grass pollen extract) is classified as a prescription medicine in Australia. RecommendationThat phleum pratense extract should classified as a prescription medicine. |
||||||||||
8.1.k |
TofacitinibTofacitinib is a janis kinase (JAK) 1, 2 and 3 kinase inhibitor with some limited inhibitory activity against tyrosine kinase 2 (TyK2). Tofacitinib is indicated for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis in adults who have had an inadequate response or are intolerant to methotrexate. Tofacitinib can be used alone or in combination with non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, including methotrexate. Therapy with tofacitinib should be initiated and monitored by a rheumatologist or specialist physician with expertise in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Tofacitinib is classified as a prescription medicine in Australia. RecommendationThat tofacitinib should be classified as a prescription medicine. |
||||||||||
8.1.l |
VelpatasvirVelpatasvir is a novel pangenotypic hepatitis C virus (HCV) non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitor for use in combination with sofosbuvir for the treatment of HCV infection. Velpatasvir, in a fixed combination with sofosbuvir, is indicated for the treatment of chronic HCV infection in adults. Velpatasvir is classified as a prescription medicine in Australia. RecommendationThat velpatasvir should be classified as a prescription medicine. |
||||||||||
8.1.m |
VorapaxarVorapaxar is an inhibitor of the protease activator protein 1 receptors on platelets that are activated by thrombin. Vorapaxar is indicated for the reduction of atherothrombotic events in patients with a history of myocardial infarction or with peripheral arterial disease. Vorapaxar is classified as a prescription medicine in Australia. RecommendationThat vorapaxar should be classified as a prescription medicine. |
||||||||||
8.2 |
Decisions by the Secretary to the Department of Health and Aging in Australia (or the Secretary’s Delegate)The Committee noted that the Delegate had also made the following amendments to the Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons: |
||||||||||
8.2.1 |
Decisions by the Delegate – March 2016 |
||||||||||
a. |
Benzodiazepine derivativesThe Australian Delegate has administratively amended the listings of benzodiazepines derivatives under Schedules 2 and 9 (prescription medicine and prohibited substances) of the Therapeutics Good Administration Act 1989. The Australian Delegate decided that:
In New Zealand, benzodiazepine derivatives are captured under a group entry in Medicines Regulations 1984. Benzodiazepine derivatives are also individually listed under Schedule 3: Class C controlled drugs of the Misuse of Drugs Act as class 5 controlled drugs. It was proposed to adjust the administrative listing of benzodiazepine derivatives for clarity by maintaining the group listing and also to individually list each benzodiazepine derivative by their classification under the Medicines Act. RecommendationThat the group classification for benzodiazepine derivatives remains and that each known derivative is also included individually in Schedule 1 of the Medicines Regulations. |
||||||||||
b. |
ParacetamoThe Australian Delegate considered a proposal to amend its pharmacy only (Schedule 2) entry of paracetamol to:
Paracetamol is classified as a pharmacy only medicine (Schedules 2), restricted medicine (Schedule 3) and a prescription medicine (Schedule 4) in Australia. Pharmacy only medicine (Schedule 2) Paracetamol for therapeutic use:
Restricted medicine (Schedule 3) Paracetamol when combined with ibuprofen in a primary pack containing 30 dosage units or less except when included in Schedule 2. Prescription medicine (Schedule 4) Paracetamol:
It was proposed to amend the classification of paracetamol in New Zealand to align with the Australian scheduling of paracetamol. The Committee considered harmonising with the above classification. DiscussionThe Committee reviewed the changes made in Australia. The Committee noted the comment made regarding the complications of limiting pack sizes and that classification cannot be used to limit the number of packs sold in a single purchase. This lead to the discussion of the practice in the UK, where supermarkets limit the sales of paracetamol to two packs per customer. The Committee noted that this practice is self-implemented and that the UK supermarkets are being socially responsible. The Committee noted that Medsafe considered that a pack size of more than 100 tablets is not considered an over the counter medicine. The Committee noted that some pharmacies and supermarkets have websites which permit the purchase of general sale medicines and pharmacy only medicines, including paracetamol. The Committee also noted that paracetamol for sale in store or online can be purchased in unlimited quantities. The Committee discussed the possibilities of restricting online sales of paracetamol from pharmacies and supermarkets in New Zealand to limit the number of packs that can be purchased. RecommendationThat the pharmacy only entry should be amended to a single pack size of a maximum of 100 tablets or capsules. That no other change should be made to the existing classifications of paracetamol. That Medsafe should write to the Pharmacy Council and the Food and Grocery Council appraising them that general sale packs of paracetamol should not be sold online by grocery retailers. Pack sizes sold by online pharmacies should be restricted to 32 tablets or capsules and similar oversight should be applied as to in store shopping. |
||||||||||
9 |
Agenda items for the next meetingThe following items will be added to the agenda of the next meeting:
|
||||||||||
10 |
General business |
||||||||||
10.1 |
Letter from New Zealand Self Medication Industry on the classification of pholcodineThe Committee discussed the letter from New Zealand Self Medication Industry (NZSMI) on the classification of pholcodine. It was noted that pholcodine had been reviewed several times and that the last time the Committee reviewed it was in 2013. It was considered that no new information was available for review. The Committee noted paragraph 7 and considered that the interpretation of the data was incorrect and misleading. A recent study by Katelaris et al has provided new evidence that links pholcodine consumption with antibodies to pholcodine (PHO), morphine (MOR) and suxamethonium. It compared the lgE antibody levels between Australia, a relatively high consumer of pholcodine, with those in Japan and Korea, where pholcodine is not available. Specifically, it found that in Australia 10% were positive to PHO and 8.6% to MOR compared to 0.8% in Japan and 1.0 and 0.5%, respectively, in Korea. Reported anaphylactic reactions to NMBAs are more than 10 times as frequent in Australia than in Japan. These authors concluded that this study supports the pholcodine hypothesis. The Committee considered that if there was a cause for concern that the appropriate mechanism would be to remove pholcodine from the Medicines Regulations. In which case, Medsafe would need to reassess the risk:benefit profile or determine whether the concerns raised could be mitigated via reclassification. RecommendationThat the Secretary should write to New Zealand Self Medication Industry informing them that the Committee did not consider there to be sufficient evidence to support a submission for the reclassification of pholcodine. |
||||||||||
11 |
Date of next meetingThe next meeting will be held in May 2017. |
There being no further business, the Chair thanked members and guests for their attendance and closed the meeting at 2:20 pm.